Sotto Voce.

"Qui plume a, guerre a." — Voltaire

The Opposite of Simplicity Isn’t Complexity

Right now I’m reading Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple’s Success. It’s written by Ken Segall, a veteran creative director who has run many quality ad campaigns for some very big corporate names, so he knows whereof he speaks. But there was one thing he said that I found myself disagreeing with, and I thought I’d flesh out my thoughts a little bit here.

In his book, Mr. Segall argues that the “evil twin” of simplicity is complexity. When I read that, it brought me up short. Something about that equation seemed off. They didn’t — and they still don’t — feel like natural opposites to me. Once I thought about it, I realized why: it’s an apples-and-oranges comparison. Simplicity is a design concept. Complexity is an engineering one. Furthermore, I’d argue, not only are simplicity and complexity not good-vs-evil opposites, they can and often do complement each other.

See, the opposite of simplicity isn’t complexity — it’s clutter. Apple is obsessed with removing clutter. To make an uncluttered design usable, however, requires complexity on a virtuosic scale. The simpler the visible interface, the more complex the invisible processes required to make it work simply.

The overarching principle of Apple’s design philosophy, I contend, is not simplicity, but usable simplicity. And there’s a vast difference between the two.

So as I’m reading the book, wherever I encounter the word “complexity” I mentally replace it with “clutter,” and the resulting sentence is much more effective. Otherwise, I’m in agreement with Mr. Segall’s perceptive and engaging analysis.

Oh, and another thing — by the same token, “complex” and “complicated” aren’t always as synonymous as they look.

POSTSCRIPT: 3/14/15:
Just came across this quote by Sir Jony Ive that captures the same idea:

“Simplicity is not the absence of clutter, that’s a consequence of simplicity. Simplicity is somehow essentially describing the purpose and place of an object and product. The absence of clutter is just a clutter-free product. That’s not simple.”


Categorised as: Life the Universe and Everything

Comments are disabled on this post


One Comment

  1. Michael says:

    I absolutely agree with you. Simplicity and complexity are NOT opposites. As you said something may be so complex, that it is actually simple.


Discover more from Sotto Voce.

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading