Sotto Voce.

January 27, 2010

Launch (i)Pad

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 5:22 pm

As I’ve said before, when I bought my PowerBook way back in mumble mumble, I was so impressed with how much of a leap it was over my previous iBook, I predicted that the next time I bought a Mac, it wouldn’t have a (physical) keyboard.

Well, it took longer than I wished, but damned if it wasn’t worth the wait. The iPad just absolutely bullseyes my hopes and expectations. And for about $50 less than I was expecting to pay too.

During today’s rollout I kept refreshing between Engaget (Winner of the Best Blog Coverage award), Macworld, CNET (Winner of the Best AV Coverage award for Buzz Out Loud), and a few others. Ars Technica I couldn’t even get to, so heavily was it being hammered. How many times did Twitter lock up? About two seconds after the name was announced, it felt like the whole web crashed. It was so cool.

And it looks like I’ll even be able to get it in time for my long-awaited “2010 Moment.” More on that later.

UPDATE: Wow. I mean, I know that haters gonna hate and all, but still, a lot the carping in the wake of the iPad debut — over a product, need I remind, that hasn’t even yet shipped and for which developers have yet to write anything to play to its strengths or expose its weaknesses — is just downright surreal:

  • People who have concluded that, even though no single device can save publishing as we know it, it isn’t going to single-handedly save Publishing As We Know It . Therefore it will fail.
  • People who have concluded that, even though the iPad isn’t aimed at them, they’re not going to buy one. Therefore it will fail.
  • People who have concluded that, even though the iPad isn’t a computer, it’s not a computer. Therefore it will fail.
  • People who have concluded that, even though the App Store has been a bottomless gold rush, no one wants DRM content. Therefore it will fail.
  • People who have concluded that, even though Apple invents products that define new markets, it doesn’t fit into a defined market. Therefore it will fail.
  • People who have concluded that, because they can’t imagine how they would use it, no one will imagine how to use it. Therefore it will fail.

But I think that my favorite reaction is this one: people who are disappointed because the iPad meets their expectations.

That’s me walking out of the room, just shaking my head.

January 21, 2010

The Good, the Perfect, and the Ugly

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 4:29 pm

That does it. I’ve finally had it up to here with the perfect is the enemy of the good as an excuse for crappy writing.

If it is true that the perfect is the enemy of the good, then let me stand shoulder to shoulder with the perfect as it battles the good. Let me steal into the tent of the good late at night and slay it where it sleeps.

And if I shall fall while fighting for the perfect, let them never dare say that I fought for a lost cause. Let them instead know that I fought for the noblest cause of all — the drive to improve, the impulse to reach higher, the fundamental urge to aspire.

Those who would fain invoke one’s inevitable failure to achieve perfection as an excuse for never trying to attain it, I say unto you, o band of brothers, that such men shall never truly drink richly from the fountain of life.

And that’s just from reading blogs. Don’t get me started on discussion forums.

December 30, 2009

The Last Restaurant Review

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 11:50 am

This shall be my last Year in Review article for Restaurant World, as the magazine stops its presses forever. With the closing of the last restaurant in the world — a small mom-and-pop pizza joint in Newark — there’s no need for restaurant reviewers anymore. Oh, sure, we could have broadened our appeal to cover Dumpster Diving, but there’s no integrity in that. So rather than compromise, we’re selling off the assets to buy one last homemade gourmet meal for the crew, and then all go our separate ways, remembering the glory days with warm nostalgic brandy glaze of fondness.

Looking back on The Decade That Was with 20/20 hindsight, it seems so self-evident now that the demise of brick-and-mortar restaurants was foredoomed by the arrival of the soup kitchens. The restaurants initially sneered at these small, slick fly-by-night operations that sprang up everywhere in the wake of the economic meltdown; after all, homeless people didn’t even know how to make reservations. What possible threat could they be to well-established five-star houses of epicure? If only we had realized that we were looking at a revolution.

For as unemployment rose, the soup kitchens rebranded themselves to appeal to the young hip crowd. Ambient music and free wifi complemented the traditional free-food offerings, and suddenly a generation of young people were taking to the streets chanting “Food Wants to Be Free” and extolling the unstoppable power of the handout economy. The chill that went through the restaurant boardrooms could have congealed a mint jelly. Overnight, restaurants — with their large staffs of professional cooks, knowledgeable wait staff, and polite cloakroom attendants — looked like doddering dinosaurs from a bygone era.

Trying desperately to capitalize on the soup kitchen trend in order to recoup some of its plunging revenue, the restaurant industry opened up its own line of soup kitchens around the country, in direct competition with the upstarts. And how people did flock to them! Publications like Restaurant World declared a new Golden Era of Restaurants as the number of visits rose to all-time highs. All the quality food and service of expensive restaurants and none of the costs? What could possibly go wrong?

Well, of course the idea was that, once people got a taste of all that delicious free food at the soup kitchen, they’d be willing to pay for it by going to the restaurants down the street. And advertisers promised them even more money by offering to install donation boxes in restaurant foyers, so that patrons could drop in a dime or a quarter and get a free advertisement to read while they were waiting to be seated.

The strategy smacked of genius and the restaurant owners awaited the gold rush, as the lines outside the restaurants’ soup kitchens stretched for blocks and the so-called “charity” soup kitchens (and their uncouth clientele) disappeared forever. The bean counters were delighted with these numbers, and predicted that the next quarter would finally turn a profit.

But for some reason, that promised next quarter never came. In order to meet the demand for free quality food, the restaurants shipped ever more of their prime rib, their lobsters thermidor, and their caviar to the soup kitchens, but gradually ran out of money to buy more. World-class chefs were no longer willing to work for soup-kitchen stock (the paper variety at first, then eventually the broth), especially after their pensions were raided by the restaurants in order to — yes — buy more food.

Desperate to find out what had gone wrong, the restaurant industry commissioned polls, surveys, and focus groups to plumb the mystery of the consumer mind. They were stunned by the results. Almost everyone surveyed, it turned out, preferred not to pay for food if they didn’t have to. Food, the restaurants finally had to admit, really did want to be free.

From then on, Restaurant World magazine read like a death watch on the industry — hundreds, then thousands, of restaurant closures a week, shutting down their once-popular soup kitchens in their wake. Some of the laid-off waiters tried to keep their old employers’ soup kitchens open, but they quickly exhausted the stockpiles of ramen and rice that they had hoped would tide them over while waiting on foundation grants so they could once again buy steak and Chilean sea bass.

In the meantime, desperate to find new sources of free food to replace those that had disappeared, city people turned to ever more home-grown methods. Many fled to farms and ranches in search of free meals, only to learn that making food is a long, complicated, and dirt-prone process. The photo of the gaunt young hipster following a cow around with a fork and knife still haunts us all — worthy of a Pulitzer, if they were still giving out Pulitzers.

So finally, overwhelmed by the gloom of the Last Decade of Restaurants, and plagued by a growling stomach, I must close out my last column in this final issue of this esteemed publication. I take with me nothing but fond memories, and this drum of newsprint, which I can probably boil down into a nice stew.

December 20, 2009

Pens, Pogues, and Puffery

Filed under: Papercasting — sottovoce @ 6:55 pm
From the Desk of David Pogue: Should e-Books Be Copy Protected?

Pens, Pogues, and Puffery - 1
(more…)

October 28, 2009

Solo Around the World

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 11:56 am

Part of map from Polly's siteAt last month’s Baltimore Book Festival, Gregg Wilhelm asked me to do a stint providing fiction pitch critiques at the CityLit Stage on Saturday afternoon. Well, for the inventor of bludos, anything. And I’m really glad I did, because it turned out to be one of those prime serendipity moments that I’ll remember forever.

The critiquers — a poet, an agent, the managing editor of a local magazine, and myself — sat around chatting as we waited for passersby clutching their manuscripts to poke their heads in the tent with that Daniel-in-the-lion’s-den look that we all know so well. A poet was first, and off went our poet to review his work. Then came Polly Bart, a Baltimore-based green builder, rider of horses and motorcycles, and all-around Renaissance woman. She started out by talking to the nonfiction critiquer (the magazine editor), but quickly the agent and then I got called in too.

She was pitching an idea for a book on green building techniques, which is hot right now, and we all put our heads together trying to suss out an angle that might help her book stand out. But it’s a crowded market, and we were struggling until she paused and said, “well, you know, I do have this other idea…”

And for the next fifteen minutes Polly just burned with a story of how she was preparing to embark on an eighty-day trip around the world — Japan, Thailand, Bhutan, India, Kenya, India, France, and Scotland — to learn about local sustainable building techniques and their intimate connection with the rights of women in those cultures. She talked about how she would be staying in a Buddhist monastery in Kyoto, riding a motorcycle in the mountains near Chiang Mai, and working on a kibbutz in the Arava Valley. The more she talked, the more we boggled.

When she was done, she asked, almost sheepishly, what we thought. She had held an agent, a magazine editor, a poet (who joined us halfway through), and a freelance writer absolutely spellbound for the whole time; then we all started speaking at once — about book deals, magazine interviews, and people she absolutely had to talk to at the Festival. As she tried to write everything down, Polly probably thought we were all crazy. We were — about her.

Well, Polly’s on her way and blogging about her journey. She’s traveling solo, but she’s not traveling alone. She didn’t have time to score a book deal before she left, or get a full-page spread in the Sun, but in her own quiet, deeply personal way she’s making her own splash.

Polly is one of the many people writing for, and sharing with, friends in what I call the “smallweb,” the thriving sub-subculture that exists like a quiet country road running parallel to the noisy freeway of the “bigweb,” where people race by in their insatiable jostling for attention and stats. The smallweb is made up of chance encounters, found moments, and surprises that lie at the end of roads less traveled. It has room for discovery and serendipity. It happens offline as much as on.

The rest of the world may not be following her trip — yet — but that’s OK by her. She knows who we are. And thanks to the smallweb, I can say that I know who she is too. Thanks to Polly, several corners of the world are about to become personal.

October 21, 2009

The Night of My Ravel Fever

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 5:06 pm

When I go to sleep with a fever, my dreams tend to be vivid and complex. (When I get sick while asleep, which has happened a few times, my dreams are the opposite — stick figures against white or gray backgrounds. Absolutely true.) Yesterday an incipient cold that I caught while walking in the rain in Lancaster, PA, on Saturday turned into a full-blown Force 10 fever — the kind where there’s a white-hot bar of pressure across the bridge of your nose turning your eyeballs into puddles of lava, and even the air hurts your skin.

You know how with a fever you feel best around noon and then as the day wears on you get steadily worse? Well, by 8 p.m. I was pretty much dead. I crawled into bed but I couldn’t fall asleep. So I killed time by listening to some of my favorite Comfort Music, particularly Maurice Ravel. His music doesn’t play in my ears; it plucks the strands of my DNA. Just the kind of trip I needed at that moment.

While listening to his Pavane, and delirious, I wandered over to his bio on Wikipedia. Ah, such names! Such times! Satie, Faure, and Debussy! Mussorgsky and Rimsky-Korsakov! Bakst, Fokine, Diaghilev, Nijinsky! 1899! 1905! I just let myself drift away into a sepia-toned Lartigue panorama of La belle epoque.

As I slept, I had a most wonderful dream. All those men had gathered together in my sunny, arboreal drawing room for a salon. In intimate clusters of two and three they were having heated debates, telling stories and laughing at jokes, picking out tunes on the piano, debating philosophy, and critiquing, critiquing, critiquing. It was raucous, invigorating, a spectacle.

Around 11:30 my fever broke, and so did the salon as the guests began to take their leave — handshakes of farewell and gratitude, calls across the room to departing friends, the shuffle of donning coats and hats. After the last guest had left, I noticed a handwritten manuscript lying on one of the tables. As I looked at it, I realized that it hadn’t been forgotten; the guests had been collaboratively writing it throughout the salon, and had left it as a gift of thanks to their host.

I looked at the title: Ravel l’AviateurThe Aviator Ravel. I started reading; it’s an amazing story they created.

I’m looking forward to translating the rest of it.

October 2, 2009

Of Both Shadows and Substance

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 11:24 am

Rod Serling CaricatureThe golden anniversary of The Twilight Zone has just come to pass. And two generations later, we writers who set out to follow Rod Serling still haven’t caught up with him. He will forever be five minutes and one hundred steps ahead of us, tantalizing us to try ever harder.

Conventional wisdom holds that a genre anthology show could never gain traction in this age of season-length story arcs and continuity-obsessed fandom. If so, it is a loss, because there is a lot that writers can learn from developing the skill to create a consistent world, populate it with compelling characters, establish a dilemma, and resolve it in 25 minutes — and then do it again. Each episode of The Twilight Zone, even the ones that reached for the easy tropes (”You can’t go home again after all.” “They’re not who/what they think they are.” “They’re dead but they don’t know it.” “They’ve time-traveled into the future/past.”) still had to grab people’s attention and keep them from changing the channel. They are all compact, portable writing lessons.

The allegories were my favorites. Chief among them is certainly The Obsolete Man:

I came of age when the new series debuted. I loved it, and still do. It’s not as well regarded by fans as the original, but it should be; most of the stories were as good as any from the original series. My favorite? Unquestionably To See the Invisible Man:

So thanks, Mr. Serling. Qui audet adipiscitur.

September 23, 2009

Some Unsolicited Advice for the President, who Presumably Does Not Read This Blog Anyway

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 6:40 am

Dear Mr. President:

In Washington, the bullies set the terms of the debate. There are only two ways to deal with bullies: kick their asses in public, or humiliate them in public.

Please pick one and do it, so that you can get back to doing what the people sent you to Washington to do.

This compromise schtick is getting really old.

Sincerely,
Paul Lagasse

PS — While you’re at it, please replace Rep. Pelosi and Sen. Reid with people who have backbones.

September 20, 2009

Sound Tracks

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything — sottovoce @ 1:19 pm

Music has always been an important creative tool for my writing. I am a film score buff; I love to annoy Mrs. Sotto Voce, when we’re watching movies on TV, by playing “Name That Composer” — how quickly into the opening credits can I identify who wrote the score? (I don’t play for movies for which I already know the answer; that would be cheating).

I co-opt film scores as background music for scenes and sometimes whole stories of my own. And in turn, listening to those scores helps me to slide quickly into the mental mindset to write. The “score” for my novel Seeing Through Clouds was that of the movie Country; James Horner’s playful Sneakers score captured the feel of my novella Invasion of the Orb Men; and I’ve lost count of how many epic space operas I plotted, as a teenager, to Horner’s verdant Star Trek scores.

I rely on music (not always film scores) for my nonfiction work too: my MA thesis was done to the music of Steve Roach and Dead Can Dance; my perpetual work-in-progress memoir of Lord Thomson is fueled by the many (non-Bond) scores of His Magisterial Awesomeness, John Barry; and my freelance writing requires me to cocoon myself in the insulating warmth of the streaming audio of RadioIO, SomaFM, and Coolstreams.

But I am working on a new SF short story/novellette, and I have been hampered by the lack of a soundtrack for it. After flailing around for a while auditioning various scores and composers, I discussed it with Mrs. Sotto Voce. She knows the short story’s themes and suggested Michael Nyman’s perfection for Andrew Niccol’s SF masterpiece, Gattaca.

Yep, that’s it. The themes of the movie are similar enough to the themes of my story — an individual out of place; a society in which a smooth, stylish coating of order and rationality deflects people’s gaze from its underlying violence. And Nyman’s score has phrases of such poignancy and passion that there’s no way that you can — well, that I can — ever get through the end of the movie with dry eyes.

That last bit is a vital necessity for my short story. My crit group has pointed out, and rightly so, that the writer’s voice (both mine and the narrator’s) is too cold and emotionally distant for the overt and covert tensions that drive the story. Listening to Nyman would melt that frigidity like turning a blowtorch on a popsicle. And that’s so what this story needs. It needs to boil.

Thanks, Mrs. Sotto Voce. And thanks in advance, Mr. Nyman. The score hasn’t been released (legally) for download, but I have a CD on the way. And my writing will be all the better for it. In the meantime, I should go watch the movie again. Any excuse.

September 8, 2009

Hooray

Filed under: Life the Universe and Everything, Papercasting — sottovoce @ 5:27 pm

He’s back.

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress